Showing posts with label National Cancer Institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Cancer Institute. Show all posts

Monday, November 2, 2015

Cell Therapy Manufacturing Best Practices from PCT


This article is the second in a series of weekly posts featuring cell therapy news and articles as reported by BioProcess International Magazine. 


By: Leah Kinthaert

In the October 15 issue of BioProcess International, a group of industry thought leaders consisting of Bob Preti, Ann Daus, Cenk Sumen and Brian Hampson from PCT - Caladrius were asked to give their opinions on the most successful strategies for manufacturing in the cell therapy industry.

Best practices for commercial cell therapy manufacturing
The team states that implementing DbD or Development by Design, consisting of these facets: quality, cost of goods, scalability and sustainability (picture above), will "provide significant cost and time advantages as a cell therapy moves along in its clinical process".

Compliance at cell therapy manufacturing facilities
A foundational state of compliance entails that people, facilities, systems and processes are unified in compliance, and that a QTF or quality task force is created  which includes "representatives from manufacturing, operations, and quality groups, with different areas of industry experience." They caution cell therapy developers not to wait to worry about quality until something has gone wrong - such as delays or regulatory actions - but to have the QTF in place from the beginning.

Develop QTPP early
The team gives another strong message about preparation when it comes to QTPP or quality target product profile. As with QTF, waiting to develop a QTPP can lead to problems.

Strategic Commercial Manufacturing Plan
One last acronym they recommend is a SCMP or strategic commercial manufacturing plan. Keeping with the theme of planning the future to avoid potential problems, a SCMP needs to include: "an evaluation of a developer’s current manufacturing processes; an analysis of those processes for areas of potential optimization and improvement; and a practical, implementable strategy to take a process from its current state to a future, commercial-ready state while reducing risks." You can read the entire article here.

PCT - Caladrius in the News: 
In his opening remarks at the BioProcess International Conference Cell Therapy Pre-Conference Symposia, Chairperson Kurt Tisler showed a map of the US with a handful of companies on it. The map included "Cell Therapy CMO Options in the US" and PCT was one of only 3 private companies and another handful of institutions that were options for Phase III in cell therapy. The map gave a striking picture of just how much those companies are in the forefront of cell therapy manufacturing. The past two months have been eventful for this industry leader, with news on multiple fronts. What follows is a brief run-down of noteworthy news about this organization.

PCT supporting IRX's development of IRX-2
PCT is providing IRX "with personnel and dedicated clean room capacity within its current cGMP infrastructure and pursuant to EU cell therapy manufacturing standards.” Caladrius is the only cGMP-compliant cell therapy manufacturing provider that has facilities on both the East and the West Coasts. Additionally they are the only one to see a client's cell therapy product receive approval from the FDA for commercial sale.

PCT has entered into a collaboration agreement with Sanford Research to develop CLBS03
The initial focus will be the execution of a clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CLBS03 in adolescents. The Phase 2 study has an open and active IND; subject enrollment is expected to commence the first quarter of 2016.

NIH's National Cancer Institute gives $300K in funding, with a potential $2 million to follow
This will fund the first phase process optimization of Caladrius' therapeutic agent targeting tumor-initiating cells. The $2 million in funding is to be expected in June 2016 if both the government and Caladrius agree to proceed at the conclusion of the first phase.





Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Major Challenges Facing Immunotherapy Developers

  

Dr. Marc Better, Vice President of Product Sciences, Kite Pharma - a Keynote Speaker at this years Cell Therapy Bioprocessing & Commercialization Event, sat down to discuss the current projects he is working on at Kite Pharma, the biggest challenges facing immunotherapy developers, regulatory hurdles, and this years meeting. Below you will find a brief teaser from the interview, to access the full interview, follow the links below...


What are the biggest challenges facing immunotherapy developers?

Well really, I think the biggest challenge for us is that we are charting new ground. There really isn’t a lot of precedent for bringing this type of product to the market. However, we do know - at least in the early trials we are seeing really exciting results both with our collaborators at the NCI and other institutions. We are building a lot of processes and systems around this to allow us to expand these programs and commercialize products like KTC 19.

Any field that is as innovative and exciting as this is very challenging, but we are very committed to being the best in the area that we can possibly be....[Click here to continue reading] 


Want to hear more from Dr. Better? Join him in Alexandria, VA for Cell Therapy Bioprocessing & Commercialization, September 30 - October 2, 2015 - where Dr. Better will have a keynote address titled "Overcoming Challenges for Engineered Autologous T-Cell Therapy". To see the complete agenda, click here. And register now with the code XB15188BLOG to save $100 off the current rate.

See you in Alexandria!


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, August 6, 2015

Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics Interview | Ira Pastan, M.D., National Cancer Institute

The annual Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics is the #1 forum for academia and industry to connect for scientific exchange and networking in antibody engineering & therapeutics, immunobiology and next-generation binders. The 2015 event is taking place December 7-10 in San Diego, CA.

Below is an interview conducted at the 2014 event with Ira Pastan, M.D., Co-Chief Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute. At the event, Dr. Pastan presented "Recombinant Immunotoxins: From Conception to Clinical Reality in Leukemia and Mesothelioma"





Want to hear more from experts like Dr. Pastan? Then join us at the 2015 Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics event. Register today at save $550 when you use the code D15172BLOG.

See you in San Diego!


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Show me the (“Fit-for-purpose”) Biospecimen Evidence Based Practices (BEBP’s) Data


By Lisa B Miranda

The term Biospecimen Evidence Based Practices or BEBP’s appears to have been recently coined by colleagues from the United States National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch.  Last month, Engel et al published an article in Biopreservation and Biobanking titled “National Cancer Institute Evidence Based Practices: A Novel Approach to Pre-Analytical Variability Standardization”. As many in the biobanking field are aware variance in sample management practices can affect biospecimen integrity and often alters quality.   Biobanks typically aim to address this issue via adherence to standard operating procedures and protocols, documentation of any inter-specimen variability for reference during analysis downstream, as well as implementation of automated sample processing technologies, which some believe may reduce technical inconsistencies often found in manual practice.  In Kelly et al’s article the cogent point is made that while internal standardization of biobanking sample management practices aides in optimizing pre-analytical variability of specimens at one’s own site, this does not address the equally important issue of managing variability across biobank sites.   Optimizing and understanding pre-analytical variability across sites is a common issue for an abounding number of biospecimen research collaborations (i.e. multi-center clinical trials) and network based biobanking activities (i.e. aggregation of and analysis samples across sites), etc.  

Looking back in retrospect from last year’s conference while looking prospectively to the 2014 conference, it is clear that quality-driven-collaboration is an ongoing theme echoed again this year by the theme of optimizing quality control and sample integrity.  In my opinion the one thing that ties these two themes together and addresses the issue of cross-site inter-variability is “fit for purpose” evidence based biobanking.   This approach advocates prospective development of BEBP’s, which regardless of site of origin should provide reproducible validated results.  Navigating “fit for purpose” evidence based protocol requirements requires a certain level of precision. Planning of which should be driven by the specimen, molecule and analyte of interest otherwise referred to as an SMA-approach. To increase the likelihood that a biospecimen collection is managed in a fit-for-purpose fashion, it is essential that biobanks and biospecimen resources prospectively define their procedures using an evidence based focus.  What isn’t so apparent is how to get there so that this idea can become a common reality. 

In 2012 I developed a fit-for-purpose evidence based protocol framework which was distributed in its early stages at when IIR’s conference was its 5th year.  In September I’ll be giving a talk with a colleague at IIR’s 7th Biorepositories and Sample Management Conference.  The talk will offer insight from a recent collaboration amongst pharmaceutical, academic and biotech colleagues with whom the fit- for- purpose evidence based protocol development framework has been vetted.  In this talk we plan to present a brief overview along with relevant lessons learned, feedback and take homes from presentation and peer based discussion amongst the broader biobanking community.  The technical and scientific framework is meant to function as a quality control instrument, consists of nine sections and is designed to offer utility in a two ways.  Firstly, it can be used as a guidance document (checklist and worksheet) and fit-for-purpose (FFP) planning exercise (to assist biobanks in understanding evidence based biobanking requirements) so that BEBP’s can be established in real time. Secondly, it can be utilized retrospectively as an internal audit tool (to ensure your biobank protocols, operations and equipment can support FFP sample management.)  The comprehensive document factors in best practices as well as relevant reporting guidelines (e.g. BRISQ).  With the advent of biospecimen science leading the way for evidence based biobanking practices, Biobankers have an amazing opportunity to impact both the biomedical research and clinical realms in a significant capacity.  This instrument if implemented across biobank sites could accelerate real time practice of evidence based biobanking and remedy the issue Engel et al raise regarding variability between multiple sites.  If all sites in an organization or collaboration incorporate this framework, they’d be more apt to increase proficiency of biospecimen collection quality and be more adept at ruling out variability between collections across sites.  If this topic and information interests you, we hope to see you at the conference September 8-10, 2014 in Boston.  Check out what we’ve got lined up.

Save your seat now and you could SAVE 15%. Use discount code XP1998BLOG. Register here.

About the Author:  Lisa Miranda is President and Chief Executive Officer of Biobusiness Consulting Incorporated, a biobanking and biotechnology commercialization advisory based in the Greater Boston Area.  She is known worldwide as a biobanking and clinical research subject matter expert.  Much of her work focuses on biobank strategic planning and/or development of biospecimen research applications and biotechnology commercialization.  She may be reached at: lisabmiranda@biobusinessconsulting.com

Join the convo. Sign up for e-mail updates
Check us out on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter @FutureOfBiopharma


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Friday, August 20, 2010

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. expands biorepository in Maryland

According to Boston.com, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. will be expanding their facility in Frederick, Maryland by 22,000 square feet. The extra space will be used to host cancer specimens. The majority of samples hosted at the facility are from clinical trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute.



Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, July 15, 2010

Meet the 2010 Biorepositories Speaking Faculty

Now in its third year, the IIR Biorepositories event convenes the most innovative minds that have recognized early on the critical need to protect sample integrity. The expanded speaking faculty in 2010 is unparalleled - hear from these and other distinguished industry leaders on September 27-29, 2010 in Boston!

Helen M. Moore, PhD, Biospecimen Research Network, Office of the Director, NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE

Marie-Claire Peakman, Executive Director, PFIZER
Improve Biobank Effectiveness through Continuous Operational Improvement and Greater Customer Focus

Anita Nelson, Manager, R&D Human Sample Biorepository, GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Insights to Adapt Your Sample Management Strategy to the Changing Environment

Leonardo Sahelijo, MD, Medical Director, Pharmacogenomics, TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER

Click here for the agenda for more on these speakers and their sessions:
http://bit.ly/bZVxXS



Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Biobanks a goal for National Cancer Institute

Time reports that building a national biobank is on the list of goals for the National Cancer Institute. This would be the first of its kind, and it would house tissue samples, tumor cell, DNA and blood, among other things. Canada, Britain, Norway and Sweden already have biobanks running in their countries. The collection of genes from patients around the country could help doctors link more patients with what diseases run in the genes they have. Will Americans be on board to donate their DNA?

If you're intrested in networking with other professionals in the Biorepositories field, join our Biorepositories LinkedIn Group!


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!