Showing posts with label Single Use Bioreactors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Single Use Bioreactors. Show all posts

Monday, September 29, 2014

Inside look at single use bioreactors at Genentech

Edward Chan, Technical Specialist 2, Cell Culture Pilot Plant, Genentech, recently had the chance to sit down with the BioProcess International team and preview his presentation about single use bioreactors at BioProcess International.  He shares what specific runs the operate on,   He goes in to further discuss how UNICAN addresses how single vendors and creates felxibility in the single use manufacturing process.


Chan will be presenting UNICAN: Dual Capability in Single Use Bioreactor on Tuesday, October 23. For more information on this session and the rest of the program, download the agenda. Would you like to join us in Boston at BioProcess International Conference and Exhibition? Save 20% off the standard rate when you register with code BPI14BLOG.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Monday, August 4, 2014

Inside BioProcess International: Edward Chan, Technical Specialist, Cell Culture Pilot Plant, Genentech

BioProcess International Magazine is releasing a series of podcasts over the summer to prepare for the BioProcess International Conference and Exhibition taking place this October in Boston. Next up in our exclusive podcast series is an interview with speaker Edward Chan, Technical Specialist, Cell Culture Pilot Plant, Genentech.

In this podcast, he discusses the Unican technology.  He goes in-depth on single use biorectors and where they fit into Genentech's manufacturing.  Chan also discusses how relying on one vendor and market instability are affecting manufacturing.  He also  looks at what instabilities in the supply chain lead to their decision to go with single use bioreactors.


Edward Chan, Technical Specialist, Cell Culture Pilot Plant, Genentech will be at BioProcess International Conference and Exhibition on Thursday, October 23 to give the presentation UNICAN: Dual Capability in Single Use Bioreactor . To learn more about his presentation and the rest of the program, download the agenda here. If you'd like to join us October 20-23 in Boston, as a reader of this blog when you register to join us and mention code BPI14BLOG, you can save 20% off the standard rate.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Single-Use Tech: How it Stacks Up in Virus Production

This post was contributed by @MikeMadarasz of the Institute of International Research

Over the last ten years, single-use bioreactors have been gaining traction in biopharmaceutical manufacturing by answering some of the key challenges in the industry.  We can expect manufacturers to look to this technology to answer key questions in vaccine production, especially with the need for animal vaccines reportedly expected to increase.  HIPRA, an animal health company focused on biologic products for poultry, swine and dogs among other things, had some recent experience working with single-use bioreactors (SUBs).  They outlined some of the major implications in implementing single-use bioreactors and how they stack up against multiuse bioreactors (MUBs) in a recent study.

Implementation
According to the study, the first thing that should be taken into account when considering a single-use system is whether or not you’re changing from multiuse technology or implementing a single-use system initially.  SUBs tend to deviate from conventional design, so converting from MUBs requires some adjustment on behalf of the manufacturers.  On the other hand, when beginning directly with SUBs, it becomes much easier to start small and scale-up. 

Set up time
SUB installation is much more efficient than the multiuse variety requiring only electrical, power, water and gas supplies.  In addition, the sterilization and cleaning efforts are also greatly reduced.  The report cites this as saving HIPRA about two months of set up time. 

Handling
The fashion in which SUBs and MUBs are handled also deviates.  SUBs tend to require more manual handling than MUBs, where many of the sterilization processes are automated.  To prevent some of the manual errors, many single-use bioreactors utilize a system of interchangeable tubes that must be welded together.  That said, the report recommends changing out “nonweldable” tubing for the variety that’s able to be welded in order to eliminate those errors.  
  
Quality of Process
Due to the nature of these processes and the fact that they deal with many viruses, efficiency is not the only thing that needs attention.  Safety is certainly a concern as well.  How can you properly mitigate biosafety risks?  What can be done to uphold bag integrity?  Is the vendor offering the necessary training?  These are some of the considerations that must be taken into account in both processes.

You can get the full study, Comparing Multiuse and Single-Use Bioreactors for Virus Production, here

We’ve got more on the latest in Single-Use technology.  Check out Single Use for BiopharmaceuticalManufacturing, June 9-10, Boston, MA.  You can download the agenda here.

SAVE 20%* to attend this meeting.  Register here and use code XB14187BLOG. 

Join us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter


*Off the standard rate. New registrants only. 


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Wednesday, September 18, 2013

#BPIConf – Tuesday’s Talks

Author: Brandy Sargent, Editor, Cell Culture Dish, www.CellCultureDish.com.

Today was a great day full of interesting talks at the Bioprocess International Conference. It was difficult to choose only a few, but I have highlighted three below.

Thomas Ryll, Ph.D., Senior Director, Cell Culture Development, Biogen Idec, gave a talk titled “Impact of Single-Use Bioreactors on Upstream Processing.”

Dr. Ryll did an excellent job highlighting both the advantages of single-use bioreactors and also opportunities for improvement.

In the talk single-use bioreactor advantages were identified as:
  • - Requiring reduced infrastructure
  • - Lower capital investment
  • - Ease of use and labor savings
  • - Enables scaling down production culture volume
  • - Important to goals of increased globalization
Dr. Ryll also discussed how Biogen Idec implemented single-use bioreactors at their facility in Research Triangle Park after validating single-use bioreactors on a number of points and across different size bioreactors. They converted warehouse space to “gray space” where they could use single-use bioreactors at different sizes to scale up process development in a non-clinical manufacturing setting, which eased technology transfer of the perfected process to clinical manufacturing. Another interesting comparison was shared by Dr. Ryll that looked at the cost for single-use bioreactors vs. stainless steel tank bioreactors.

It was found that single-use bioreactors:
  • - Had higher consumables cost
  • - The same raw material costs
  • - Significantly lower utilities
  • - Lower labor cost
  • - Overall single-use bioreactors costs were found to be comparable
Dr. Ryll then pointed out the following areas as opportunities for improvement in single-use bioreactors:
  • - Find balance between mass transfer and bubble size
  • - Reduce lot to lot variability in bag lots
  • - Address toxic leachable from polymer films
Richard Ferraro, Business Leader WAVE Products Group, GE Healthcare, gave a technology workshop titled “Efficient and Intelligent Process Control for Animal Cell Culture.”

In the talk Mr. Ferraro discussed the high cost of drug development and possible platform and toolbox approaches to address these issues. One of the platforms covered was an intensified process approach, for example perfusion technology.

When compared with fed batch processes intensified processes have advantages, but they can also create challenges

The talk identified the following intensified process challenges:
  • - More training required for operation because you are working with more than just the bioreactor
  • - Ancillary equipment adds complexities – including connections and monitoring
  • - Increased logistics
  • - Lots more data
GE Healthcare has taken what they have learned about challenges in intensified processes and has worked to address these challenges by implementing new solutions. They have taken their comprehensive experience in downstream systems and have applied some of the same concepts to upstream. These ideas for improvements were important in the development of the new ReadyToProcess WAVE 25 Bioreactor, particularly in the area of process control.

New Tools for Process Control:
  • - Application specific PID parameters
  • - Method editor function for scheduled changes of process conditions
  • - Accessories to facilitate process intensification; pumps, load cells & auto-calibration function
  • - Intuitive user interface, help screens, set up support
  • - Remote monitoring – WAVE25 App

GE Healthcare launched the new ReadyToProcess WAVE 25 Bioreactor at their booth Tuesday evening, please see picture above. The new WAVE has many new and improved features and it is interesting to see the advancements after so many years of WAVE bioreactors being in use.

Sandra Poole, Senior Vice President Biologics Operations, Genzyme, gave a Keynote Presentation titled “A Systems Approach to Managing Biomanufacturing Complexity – Genzyme’s Allston Plant Case Study.”

Sandra Poole gave an excellent talk describing the challenges that Genzyme faced during their viral contamination at their Allston facility and how they have implemented a systems approach to recover and again function at capacity. I appreciated Ms. Poole’s candor and sharing a real experience as a learning tool for the industry. In the talk she discussed the importance of taking a systems approach and really looking at the ripple effect that a change in one area can have on several other areas of manufacturing. These effects often aren’t expected, but it doesn’t mean that they can’t be anticipated with careful examination. She also stressed the importance of looking at system feedback loops and determining what the limiting factor is.

Ms. Poole discusses the manufacturing competency curve and how after competency improves additional tasks are regularly added, which as a result dilutes skills. In the Genzyme example, she describes how the Allston facility was originally designed just to manufacture Cerezyme, after their capability increased, manufacturing of Fabrazyme was added and then a third product, Myozyme, was also added. These additional tasks created challenges in manufacturing and did not lend itself to a systems approach.

Since the contamination, a systems approach has been implemented and the facility is running at capacity, under consent decree at 100% batch certification. They are also implementing a work plan plus improvement program targeting their entire manufacturing system.

To close the talk, Ms. Poole described the following key learnings:
  • - Understanding how a change to manufacturing can impact complexity, capability and performance
  • - Understanding balance between a plant’s complexity and the plant’s capacity to manage that complexity
  • - Choosing the right tools and metrics to judge performance and health of the system are key
  • - Need for new skills and education in systems thinking


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Development and Qualification of a Scalable, Disposable Bioreactor for GMP-Compliant Cell Culture


Today, we feature an article from our partners at BioProcessing International Magazine.



During the past decade, single-use bioreactors have become widely accepted for use in cell culture process development and clinical manufacturing. Their key benefits over stainless steel bioreactors are flexibility, cost, and time savings associated with the reduction of cross contamination risks (1).

Here, we describe our approach to development and qualification of the Biostat STR single-use, stirred-tank bioreactor. Unlike other stirred single-use bioreactors, it offers a similar design to that of well-established, conventional (stainless steel) stirred-tank bioreactors. Disposability of the single-use cultivation chamber gives it robustness, reliability, and reproducibility of biological results together with a supply assurance needed to meet biopharmaceutical industry requirements.

Development of a single-use bioreactor involves different phases of work (Pictured Left). The starting point should be a clear definition of the product’s intended application. Typically, related requirements are captured in a user requirement specification (URS). On the basis of that initial input, the bioreactor design and material selection are then initiated. The proof-of-concept phase establishes component- and product based tests that are predictive of the final application. Mechanical, chemical, and biological tests can be used to verify compliance with the URS during the prototype feasibility phase. Ideally, the production process should be qualified as well: Qualification efforts should cover production equipment, procedures, and parameters. Final product qualification can be based either on qualification of the individual components or the whole final product (or a combination of both) using mechanical and biological tests that emulate a specific intended application. Typically, this evaluation should be performed using bioreactor bags derived from regular manufacturing. All changes brought about (e.g., performance or robustness improvements) should be controlled by a stringent change-control process.

Download the full article here.

Follow the jump for references.



Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Sources of variability in disposable bioreactors

Today, we return to Dr. Rajesh Krishnan, Associate Director of Cell Line and Upstream Process Development at Gilead Sciences Process Development Work at Gilead Sciences, podcast reported for BioProcess International. In his podcast, he looks at many aspects of single use technologies. Today, he answers the question:

What are some sources of variability in disposable bioreactors in how they perform?
Rajesh: I would say the biggest source of variability, besides potential issues with resins, would be the accuracy of process control; i.e., how well you are really controlling pH, dissolved oxygen and mixing in these different bag configurations. Process control can be impacted by many parameters, including the type of probes used (either single use or standard probes) and the design of the bag. I think that is where I’ve seen the biggest variability when I’ve done these assessments of single-use bioreactors in the past.

On the other hand, product quality variability, with material made in different single-use systems, was not really that significant in my experience.
However, another difference between single-use systems is the ease of set up and use (ex. Probe insertion into bags, placement of bags into the holders, etc). This does not really lead to process variability, but it can impact facility fit of the different bioreactors.

To hear Dr. Krishnan's entire podcast, download it here.

Dr. Krishnan will be presenting the case study Investigation and Reduction of Performance Variability in Single-use Cell Culture Bioreactors on Thursday, September 19 at Bioprocess International Conference and Exhibition. For more information on this session and the rest of the program, download the agenda. If you'd like to join us, as a reader of this blog, when you register to join us and mention code BLOG13JP, you'll save 20% off the standard rate.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Monday, April 29, 2013

Eppendorf develops new single-use bioreactor

Eppendorf has developed the first single-use bioreactor for
microbial applications.

According to BioResearch Online:
The BioBLU 0.3f joins the BioBLU 0.3c which was presented last year and is designed for the cultivation of animal and human cells. Both the BioBLU 0.3c and BioBLU 0.3f are specifically designed for use with the compact DASbox mini bioreactor system. Eppendorf’s DASbox system is a unique mini bioreactor system for parallel operation of 4, 8 or more mini-bioreactors and well suited for Design of Experiment (DoE), bioprocess development screening and for use as a scaledown model. With the new BioBLU 0.3f, Eppendorf is paving the way for users of conventional microbial-based biotechnology to take advantage of, the time and cost benefits of single-use bioreactor technology, such as in pharmaceutical product development.

To learn more about Disposable Probes and Sensors? We'll have Alan Opper, Eastern Regional Manager of Finesse Solutions on hand to present Building Flexibility into Bio-Processing: Turn-Key Bioreactor Control Systems for Both cGMP and Non-GMP Applications and Kamal Rashid, Ph.D., Associate Director, Research Professor of Utah State University to present A Comparative Study of Stirred-Tank Bioreactors: Reusable (Glass) vs. Single-Use (New Brunswick CelliGen® BLU) at the upcoming Single-Use Applications for Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Summit taking place June 3-5, 2013 in Durham,North Carolina. If you'd like to find out more about these presentations, download the agenda.  If you'd like to join us, as a reader of this blog when you register to join us and mention code SU13JP to save 20% off the standard rate.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!