Showing posts with label clinical trials. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clinical trials. Show all posts

Friday, December 4, 2015

Antibodies as Drugs: A Lesson from Before the Antibiotic Era

This post was contributed by Twist Bioscience


'His penicillin will save more lives than war can spend’ was the tagline accompanying a serious-looking Alexander Fleming on the cover of the May 15th, 1944 issue of TIME Magazine. With his discovery of penicillin came the antibiotic era of medicine. However, when one giant rises, another must fall. Serum therapy was, almost overnight, systematically dethroned as the accepted treatment for infectious diseases.

The cover of the May 15th 1944 issue of TIME magazine, which features Alexander Fleming shortly after his discovery of Penicillin. Source.

Serum therapy, the treatment of an infectious disease by injection of an immunized animal’s blood serum, was first used to cure disease in the 1890s. In the 40 years it took for penicillin to be discovered, serum therapy treated a swath of diseases including tetanus, diphtheria, measles and chicken pox.

By inoculating an animal with a dead pathogen, the animal’s antibody-rich immune sera could be extracted. Injecting the immunized animal sera into patients lead to prophylactic, bactericidal, antitoxic and protective benefits. However, it would take around six months to develop a serum, and even then only around 40% of patients would show improvement, making antibiotics were a better solution1.

Today, with the threat of antibiotic resistance looming, antibody treatment is reinstating itself into the next era of medicine. Significant developments that enable us to mass-engineer an antibody’s binding domains have occurred in recent years. Our ability to screen candidates for highly efficient binding, and grow them into concentrated sera of monoclonal antibodies has also drastically improved.

With this, antibody therapy has become accepted into routine clinical practice. Antibody research is now at fever pitch, with thousands of published clinical trials on PubMed today.

Monoclonal antibodies have incredible potential in disease and disorder treatment, due to their ability to explicitly bind specific molecules. The immunosuppressant Muromonab-CD3, given to organ transplant patients, was the very first to be approved by the FDA for human use in 1985. Since its approval, many monoclonal antibodies have now been cleared for use, or are advancing through clinical testing. Disease targets include Crohn’s disease, cancer, asthma, psoriasis, diabetes, HIV, influenza and Alzheimer’s disease.

Importantly, antibody-based therapies are moving toward completely humanized monoclonals (as opposed to those sourced from mice). Research focuses on engineering low toxicity, high target specificity and improved manufacturability – all characteristics bolstered by the advent of synthetic biology, especially massively multiplex DNA libraries.

These vast libraries contain around 1010 different antibody sequences, representing every possible combination of mutations at particular points within an antibody’s variable regions. The single set of mutations that confers perfect, high-specificity binding to an antigen of interest can then be fished out with a number of high throughput screening technologies. Such advancement has been pivotal to antibody therapy research, pushing engineering costs down, reinforcing efforts to treat complex diseases with global reach, such as cancer.

The many ways an antibody can be engineered to destroy a tumor cell. Source: (Chao et al., 2012)

In addition to DNA libraries, advances in next-generation sequencing-based diagnostics have opened new avenues for targeted, personalized, antibody-based therapies. By sequencing a tumor biopsy, it is possible to identify specific cancer-related surface antigens that are overexpressed – known as the ‘oncotype’ of the patient’s tumor. The corresponding antibody treatment can then be administered.

One well-known example of a cancer-treating, FDA-approved monoclonal antibody is Herceptin – for treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer oncotypes. In a large fraction of aggressive breast cancers, HER2 is overexpressed causing accelerated cellular proliferation. Herceptin targets HER2 receptors, blocks their signaling pathway, and attenuates tumor growth and proliferation. In a 10-year study of 4,000 women with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer, treatment with Herceptin showed a 37% increase in overall survival and a 40% increase in disease-free survival compared to a cohort treated only with chemotherapy2.

A vial of the breast cancer fighting, monoclonal antibody - Herceptin. Source.

Herceptin binds specifically to its cancer-specific antigen, however, oftentimes antigens are shared between cancer and some of the body’s own cells, causing the destruction of healthy tissues.

Yvonne Chen of UCLA, who spoke at the recent 2015 Synthetic Biology Congress in London, discussed her research on integrating synthetic biology and antibody engineering to solve this problem. Her group engineered antibodies to contain additional binding domains – so one antibody will only have strong binding if two antigens are present. This ensures the antibodies exclusively bind to a specific cancer cell.

Synthetic biology tools are revolutionizing high-throughput antibody engineering. As the cost of writing DNA decreases with new methods of DNA synthesis, the speed of development will increase. Simply, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies will be able to test more options to improve specificity and manufacturability. In turn, this will enable highly targeted and highly beneficial therapies for the hardest-to-treat diseases, which can be delivered to patients worldwide.



About Twist Bioscience
At Twist Bioscience, our expertise is synthetic DNA. We have developed a proprietary semiconductor-based synthetic DNA manufacturing process featuring a 10,000-well silicon platform capable of producing synthetic biology tools, such as oligonucleotides, genes, pathways, chassis and genomes. By synthesizing DNA on silicon instead of on traditional 96-well plastic plates, our platform overcomes the current inefficiencies of synthetic DNA production, and enables cost-effective, rapid, high-quality and high throughput synthetic gene production. The Twist Bioscience platform has the potential to greatly accelerate the development of personalized medicine, sustainable chemical production, improved agriculture production as well as new applications such as in vivo diagnostics, biodetection and data storage. For more information, please visit www.twistbioscience.com. Twist Bioscience is on Twitter. Sign up to follow our Twitter feed @TwistBioscience at https://twitter.com/TwistBioscience.






1. Glatman-Freedman, Casadeval. Serum Therapy for Tuburculosis Revisited: Reappraisal for the Role of Antibody-Mediated Immunity Against Mycobacterium Tuburculosis. Clin Microb Rev. 1998.

2. Perez et al. Trastuzumab Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: Planned Joint Analysis of Overall Survival From NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Cell-based immunotherapy: Will the new “magic bullets” against cancer reach the patients?

By Fabio D'Agostino

Over the last four years we have witnessed an increasing number of promising studies and clinical trials aimed to harness the innate potential of T-cells to fight cancer. These cells can be engineered to get around the natural protection mechanisms and target tumour cells either via a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) or by affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor (TCR).The former have proven to be more effective for haematological malignancies as they can mainly target antigen on the cell surface. The latter have the potential to target also intracellular antigens and this makes them, potentially, a more suitable candidate for solid tumours. Other than Novartis, which is developing a CAR-T cell therapy (known as CTL019) with an exclusive agreement with the University of Pennsylvania, successful companies in this field include Bluebird Bio, Juno Therapeutics and Kite Pharma. Adaptimmune, which partnered with GSK last year, is, on the other hand, more focused on TCR based therapies for a number of solid tumours. Unfortunately, as target antigens are also expressed by heathy cells in vital organs, the risk of potentially lethal side effects is not negligible. While research groups try to create low-affinity CAR-T cells or other approach to reduce side effects, developers and investors wonder:

Will the industry be able to deliver and cope with the manufacturing demand?

Although one might argue that promising clinical data are the real drive, these new “living drugs” might not even reach the patients on large scale if they come with an astronomical price tag and investors might walk away from a technology that requires huge investment to be made commercially viable. Moreover, in the optimistic scenario where all the T-cell based immunotherapies currently in development will prove clinical effective, only who managed to engineer down costs, while maintain safety and effectiveness, will win the race. As T-based immunotherapies are mainly patient-specific drugs, where 1 batch is equal to 1 patient, manufacturing costs are currently very high. Other than cost-effectiveness, there are also a number of challenges which still need to be overcome, as shown in the following diagram.

An increasing number of companies worldwide are betting on closed and automated system to tackle many of these challenges. Dr Andrew Kaiser shared his vision in a recent paper1. He explains how a “device-based manufacturing” could enable to scale out production of patient specific cellular products while considerably reducing costs in terms of labour and facility. Devices like the CliniMACS Prodigy (Miltenyi Biotec), which are capable of performing automatically all steps of a conventional manufacturing process for gene-modified T-cell product, could be run in a room where an operator could oversee several units at the same time. Another interesting platform is the one developed by Octane (Canada). Octane’s automation platform consists of Cocoon, which acts as the control system, and a disposable pre-sterilized cassette, where the cell manipulations occur. Each cassette can be easily customized to the unit operations of the manufacturing process. As the process parameters are monitored and controlled, each Cocoon is able to react accordingly to sensors’ feedback to accommodate natural variation in starting cellular material from each patient. Lonza recently announced an exclusive technology evaluation of the Octane Cocoon™ cell production platform with the goal of a global deployment of this groundbreaking innovation. Dr Nuala Trainor (Director of Biological Programs at Octane Medical Group) explained how their “GMP-in-a-box” production system could solve many of the issues linked to the manufacturing of patient-specific cell-products by enabling production within the clinical facility. She even envisions a “franchising model” where the manufacturer of the automation system would be responsible for providing all elements of support required for routine implementation and all operational supplies2.

                Will automated manufacturing directly in the clinical facility be really the answer?

According to Dr Robert Preti (President of PCT and CSO at Neostem), the only way to successfully achieve scalability and sustainability for patient specific cell therapies at commercial scale is an industry-wide effort of innovation and engineering to rebuilt unit operations and move processes from a cleanroom focus towards production spaces more suited to “high-volume” production3. Perhaps this will drive the development of the new system for commercial-scale manufacturing that Neostem aims to develop with Invetech.  The push towards new facility design for cell therapy products at commercial stage is also echoed by GE Healthcare which is working towards a closed, digitally integrated, automated ecosystem capable of manufacturing patient-specific cell therapy products and distribute them worldwide in a regulatory complainant manner. New generation GMP facilities will have to be designed.

                How will a Future Factory for commercial cell-based products manufacturing look like?

In the meantime, CDMOs worldwide continue to increase their capacity to cope with the increasing manufacturing demand. Examples are Wuxi App Tec (US), MEDINET (Japan), Nikon (Japan), PharmaBIO (Japan). While automated platforms might be developed by customizing and importing technology already available; more knowledge of the “living” drug product is needed to develop analytics, potency assays and release testing for T-cell based therapies.  There is also who, to the troubles that come with patient-specific products, prefers striving to develop a universal “off-the-shelf” T-cells therapy where the cells are modified to avoid immune rejection in the recipient patient. It is the French company Cellectis which announced a strategic alliance with MD Anderson Cancer Center on clinical development of their allogeneic CART cell therapies.

After the clinical wave, a manufacturing wave of promising enabling technologies might be on its way for cell-based immunotherapy.

Fabio D’Agostino is a passionate life sciences professional with experience in both the medical device and biopharmaceutical industry. An active member of the PDA Cell and Gene Task Force, he has contributed to a number of conferences in the cell and gene therapy industries. He was also instrumental in the launch of the new journal: Cell and Gene Therapy Insights.
After graduating with Honours from the Polytechnic University of Turin (Italy) with a BSc and a Master’s in Biomedical Engineering, he started his career at LivaNova (formerly Sorin Group) before moving to Newcastle University to take an Engineering Doctorate in Biopharmaceutical Process Development. He currently holds a research position at the Institute of Genetic Medicine (Newcastle University) where he is responsible for the development of an innovative platform for modular tissue engineering.


References


[1] “Towards a commercial process for the manufacture of genetically modified T cells for therapy”, A D Kaiser, M Assenmacher, B Schröder, M Meyer, R Orentas, U Bethke and B Dropulic. Cancer Gene Therapy (2015) 22, 72–78

[2] “Rethinking clinical delivery of adult stem cell therapies”, Nuala Trainor, Alexis Pietak, Tim Smith, Nature Biotechnology 32, 729–735 (2014)            

[3] “Guest Commentary: Building a problem or a solution?”,Robert Preti, DDNews , September 2015, VOL. 11, NO. 9



Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, July 9, 2015

The Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics Final Agenda is Now Available












The Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics Final Agenda is Now Available! Click Here to Download Your Copy >>

At the upcoming IBC's 26th Annual Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics meeting in San Diego, CA on December 7-10, 2015, connect with 700+ of your peers and industry experts to discover, engineer and develop novel and next-generation antibody modalities across diverse disease indications.

This year's program includes an impressive collection of world-renowned and highly-published academic and industry scientists, who will be sharing the latest science, strategies and preclinical/clinical development efforts.

Download the brochure today to see how you can fast-tract your antibody research to the clinic and beyond at the most trusted antibody engineering and therapeutics event of the year!

Learn About The Latest Antibody Science and Applications:
• 64 unpublished and new data presentations from trusted industry and academic scientists
• 100+ research projects presented live in the Poster Hall with one-on-one access to the researchers
• 16+ Scientific Briefings to help you apply novel technologies

Expand Your Pipeline of Antibody Therapeutics: 
• Find and exploit new antibody targets beyond the “low-hanging fruit”
• Overcome the challenges of complex molecules like bispecifics, fusions, ADCs, antibody combinations to gain a competitive advantage
• Assess lessons learned from numerous preclinical and clinical projects to accelerate your molecules

PLUS! We're excited to announce the ALL-NEW Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Development track, covering: 
• Novel conjugation approaches
• Novel linkers and payloads
• Preclinical and clinical results
• New ADC targets • Strategies to maximize potency
• Widening therapeutic window
• Improving process development and analytics for ADCs

Register today to take advantage of the early-bird savings of up to $450 – Plus take an EXTRA $100 off with the code D15172BLOG | Click here to register.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Friday, September 19, 2014

Merck KGaA to Further Biosimilar Investment

Merck KGaA announced plans today keeping the group on track for its “Fit for 2018” plan for growth and transformation.  Part of those plans include an additional $165 - $190 million investment in biosimilars for 2015.  Ultimately, that exact number is dependent on the outcome of certain Phase I trials that are currently ongoing.  That, of course, is in addition the $128 million the German company has set aside for biosimilars this year.

In addition, the company plans to expand on existing partnerships with India’s Dr. Reddy’s and Brazil’s Bionovis with an in-licensing agreement for a late-stage biosimilar.  Initially, the drug will be intended for smaller, emerging markets.  Between 2015 and 2016, Merck plans to initiate anywhere from two to five Phase III clinical trials. 

The release also noted some internal shuffle within Merck.  Stefan Oschmann has been promoted to deputy CEO and Vice Chairman of the executive board while Belén Garijo will move up to the executive board and head the pharma business. 

The full press release can be found here.

We’ll have more on the latest developments in the biosimilars market at the 15thAnnual Business of Biosimilars meeting. Join us October 20-22 in Boston, MA. Download the agenda to see what’s on tap.
                                                                                                     
SAVE $100.  Register here and use code XP1986BLOG.

Follow us on Twitter: @FutureOfBiopharma & @Biosimilars
Join us on LinkedIn





Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Complimentary Web Seminar Thursday: Clinical Trial Outsourcing Dollars and Financial Sense

Date: Thursday, January 19, 2012
Time: 2:00-3:00 PM EST
Presented by:  Garen Sarafian, Vice President, Citigroup Investment Research & Analysis, Citigroup
Register here (Mention code P1700W1BLOG)


About the web seminar:
The global health care landscape is beset with multiple challenges and opportunities: regulatory, scientific, logistical and financial. This interactive Web seminar will provide a comprehensive overview of clinical trial outsourcing from a financial perspective, with a particular eye toward trends in health care technology, outsourced operations and investment considerations.

What you will learn:
- Get Wall Street’s take on the clinical outsourcing market trajectory
- Probe outsourcing financial strategies in a rapidly changing drug development environment
- Understand how clinical research outsourcing decisions can impact and improve business performance and increase your organization’s value in the eyes of investors
- Examine emerging best practices and new norms in trial outsource spending and financial management
- Explore metrics and instruments to help guide strategic decision making from a practical economic point of view

About the Presenter:
Garen Sarafian is a Vice President within the Healthcare Technology & Distribution sector at Citi Investment Research & Analysis. He has been with the firm since 2007. Most recently, Garen has been named "Best Up and Comer" in Institutional Investor’s 2010 All-America rankings. Prior to his current role, Garen covered the sector as part of a larger team that included the Managed Care sector and ranked top 3 in each of the last 8 yearly Institutional Investor rankings.

Garen also has extensive industry experience. He was a Director at Aetna, a Fortune 100 health care firm, for 5 years where he was a part of the Strategic Marketing Group. This group assessed new opportunities, identified & responded to key business issues, and advised Aetna’s various operating segments on enhancing growth.

Register to join us today!


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Emerging markets in emerging countries growing more competitive

The United States, Europe and Japan continue to be the headquarters for Pharma companies.  The cost of hosting innovation headquarters is high, but worth the price due to the innovation and research that comes out of the areas.  However many companies are seeing the importance of expanding into regions with growing markets balancing traditional headquarters with emerging markets.  May of the countries seeing an increased interest from Pharma are Brazil, India, China, Asia and Latin America.  According to Lab Manager Magazine, these countries in emerging markets are encountering growing economies, large populations, rising personal income levels and progressive political policies.  These conditions make these countries rip for investment, manufacturing being one of the key focuses.

The need for brand name Pharma products is also fueling the growth according to David Wilton, Regional Director, Corporate Solutions for Jones Lang LaSalle in Asia Pacific.  He says “In most emerging markets, local consumers seek affordable drugs from known, trusted makers so early establishment in population-dense countries like China, India and Indonesia is vital to capture market share. Demand for drugs within these markets is increasing due to the shift in lifestyle created by the rise in personal income and purchasing power. This has resulted in a heightened awareness of traditionally Western diseases and associated treatments.”

This lends itself to the growing amount of clinical trials taking place in emerging markets.  Many companies expanding to Latin America and Asia to reach new populations of potential clinical trial participants.  The Partnerships in Clinical Trials conference series looks at many of these markets through their growing portfolio of global events - Partnerships in Clinical Trials, Partnerships in Clinical Trials Latin America and Partnerships in Clinical Trials Asia.

What are the benefits from a company expanding its resources and relocating parts/expanding of its business to emerging countries?


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Friday, April 9, 2010

Live from Partnerships in Clinical Trials Next Week!

Next week, the Partnerships in Clinical Trials blog will have live coverage from the 19th Annual Partnerships in Clinical Trials event! Be sure to look for blog posts covering many of the sessions as well as following @PartnershipCROs on Twitter for live coverage from the event. If you're unable to join us, but still want to join the online conversation, be sure to mark your tweets #CROs.



Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Monday, December 7, 2009

A Look Back at Partnerships in Clinical Trials Asia Pacific!

Last week, we held the First Annual Partnerships in Clinical Trials Asia Pacific. At this meeting, we heard from many of the professionals who work closely with the clinical trails in the region, as well as where the expect to see the region to go within the next few years. See some of the sessions here:

Focus on China

Tailoring Outsourcing Strategies for the Asia-Pacific Region – Functional Insourcing

The Sponsor-Site Relationship: Optimizing the CRO Partnership

How partnering with Japan CROs Can Benefit the Global & Asian Drug Development

Regional Regulatory Briefings – What It Takes to Get Your Regional Clinical Trial Going

Accelerating Patient Recruitment and Retention in Clinical Trials


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Strategic Comparative Effectiveness Trials

Tony Dutta, senior vice president of operations at IDIS, recently wrote a great article in Applied Clinical Trials in which he describes the strategy pharma companies should put in place as the pressure mounts for them to conduct comparative effectiveness trials. Here's a brief recap of strategy he recommends.

Get strategic
To minimize delays that can evolve from financial implications, comparator sourcing strategies should include, "demand planning that can accommodate changes in the quantity of comparator drug needed in light of fluctuating patient enrollment or unexpected changes to a trial; changes in regulatory opinion, or temporary or permanent regulatory noncompliance by the source manufacturer; loss of the project's consulting global regulatory expertise; changes in global sourcing capabilities and logistics; and loss of connection to the comparator manufacturer via a sourcing specialist."

Timing is everything
A head start on planning is important as comparator drugs are like to be available from multiple places in multiple locations.


Single sourcing
Single Sourcing poses pros and cons, so sponsors should carefully evaluate risks before diving into this concept.

Read the full article

If you'd like to connect with other professionals in the field of Comparator Studies, join our Global Congress on Comparator Studies LinkedIn Group.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, February 24, 2009

More on the shift of clinical trials

Yesterday, we posted about the new study from the New England Journal of Medicine. Yahoo also recently took a look at why trials have been exiting the US. One of the main concerns this raises is that those who are being tested outside of the US maybe living a different type of lifestyle than those who actually take the medicine. The article also noted that the three biggest factors pushing trials outside of the US are cost, faster approvals and less red tape.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, February 19, 2009

How to rescue a clinical trial

At ClinPage, they recently posted an article about the keys to resuming a clinical trial if you've taken over it midway through the process. So what should you do if you're asked to resume a project after everything's been started?

They suggest:
1) Assess and plan
2) No rushing
3) Create trust
4) Initial Visits
5) Ongoing oversight

For an in-depth look at the steps, read the article here.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Pfizer Discloses Payment Information for Clinical Trials

According to this article on outsourcing-pharma.com Pfizer will disclose payments made to principal investigators, major academic institutions and research sites involved in Phase I to IV trials that exceed $500 a year and non-monetary items such as meals that cost more than $25.

Pfizer is getting closer than any drug maker in terms of full disclosure, but if the Physician Payments Sunshine Act of 2009 is passed into law, it would require companies to disclose all payments exceeding $100 a year and would face a fine of up to $1 million if they do not comply.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!