Showing posts with label biopharmaceuticals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biopharmaceuticals. Show all posts

Monday, August 29, 2016

MIT's BioMAN Announces Global Initiative

MIT's Center for Biomedical Innovation Program(BioMAN) has announced a new global health initiative. BioMAN’s mission is to “develop new knowledge, science, technologies and strategies that advance the manufacture and global delivery of high quality biopharmaceuticals”.

Frequency Therapeutics Announces Clinical Trials for Hearing Loss


Stacy Springs, who has been Director of the program since 2008, recently spoke with Nick Paul Taylor: “We have a new global health initiative that hasn't really been publicized yet,” Springs said. “It is very much focused on the different ways we need to think about ... making biologic medicines available and accessible to middle and low-income patients around the world.”

In discussions with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and PATH 

Stacy Springs elaborated on the initiative: “We certainly have been engaged in discussions with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with PATH, and others about our goals,” Springs said. The Gates Foundation is among the organizations already working to drive down the cost of manufacturing, but its focus is limited to drugs against its target diseases. Springs’ nascent initiative is broader in scope. It may, for example, look at ways to improve the availability of insulin around the world.

For the full interview with Springs download the complete report by journalist Nick Paul Taylor here: “Convergence in Boston: How multidisciplinary R&D is driving bench-to-bedside breakthroughs”. No email or registration is required.

We hope you enjoy Nick’s in-depth report. You can catch up with Stacy Spring’s newest research at Biotech Week Boston's Bioprocess International Conference and Exhibition event this October. Stacy will be on a panel entitled "Industry-Academia Collaboration in Translational Research and Biomanufacturing of Next Generation Biologics".





Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, April 2, 2015

BDP Week 2015: Extractables and Leachables

By: Maribel Rios, Managing Editor of BioProcess International

On Tuesday afternoon, 31 March 2015, the single-use track of the BioPharmaceutical Development and Production (BDP) Week meeting in Huntington Beach, California, focused on the challenges associated with particles and extractables and leachables (E&L). Bobbijo V. Redler, PhD (Merck & Co., Inc)  began by defining the terms and the different types of E&L studies, including controlled extraction studies (screening), simulation studies, leachables testing (using methods validated for registration), and routine monitoring (also using validated methods). She reviewed simulated study designs, the use of various analytical techniques for E&L studies, and efforts of the E&L team of the BioPhorum Operations Group (BPOG).

James Vogel (The BioProcess Institute) presented on the work of the Bio-Process Systems Alliance (BPSA) on its 2014 particulates technical guide, “Recommendations for Testing, Evaluation, and Control of Particulates from Single-Use Processing Equipment.” The 12-chapter compendium is targeted for both end users and supplies of single-use components and systems. The session ended with a roundtable moderated by Redler. Panelists included Weibing Ding (Biogen Idec), James Vogel, and Michael Rupperto, PhD (Material Needs Consulting). The session consisted of a Q&A with attendees. Various issues were discussed, including the following:

·         Whether the BPOG extractables protocol published last year (Ding W, et al. Standardized Extractables Testing Protocol for Single-Use Systems in Biomanufacturing. Pharm. Eng. Nov-Dec. 2014) actually is a “best practices” document and if it truly can be used for “comparability.” Panelists said that the protocol does provide some flexibility, the document is a “step forward,” and that ASTM (Association for Standards Testing and Materials) and USP (US Pharmacopeia) Chapter <661.3> work is ongoing.

·         Whether it is better to discontinue use of a component is easier than to conduct continuous monitoring for extractables. The panel answered that the decision is often a matter of time and cost and that the material may have unique properties that are needed.

·         How to determine a threshold for extractables information and the definition of BPA-free. The panel emphasized the importance of smart material selection, paying close attention to materials, including secondary packaging, and continually assessing risk.


·         Whether the BPOG protocol (above) should actually be more rigorous. The panel mentioned that not many company are conducting in-process leachables testing for process equipment, reminding attendees that suppliers are responsible for extractables tests and end users are responsible for leachables testing. The general intention is to get single-use implemented quickly. 


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Friday, February 21, 2014

BioProcess International: Biopharmaceuticals On Demand

The author from today's excerpt is Niels Haxthausen is Vice President of Sales and Marketing, NNE Pharmaplan

By 2016, five of the top 10 biopharmaceuticals are expected to be monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Follow-on (biosimilar) versions of those blockbusters will most likely become available in later years due to patent expiry and the introduction of legislation for biosimilars around the world. Personalized therapies will drive the fractionation of the biopharmaceutical market, trending biomanufacturing toward smaller batch sizes and campaign-based production schemes.

A growing need for flexible, multipurpose, and cost-effective manufacturing will significantly affect the design of production facilities in the future. Demographic and market forces place China in a position to lead the way in this transformation of biopharmaceutical manufacturing.

“Compared with other biopharmaceutical products, MAbs are large proteins that require relatively high doses — and therefore traditionally necessitate high-volume manufacturing facilities,” explains Niels Guldager (senior technology partner in biopharmaceuticals for NNE Pharmaplan, a facility engineering and consulting company focused on pharmaceuticals and biotechnology). “Many biopharmaceutical facilities are still designed as traditional stainless steel facilities with fixed piping and tank layout and large bioreactor volumes. But such facilities require significant financial investment with total installation costs in the range of US$100–300 million.”

You can view the full article here. BPI will be joining us February 10-12 for IBC's 2nd Annual Flexible Facilities conference taking place this February. To learn more, view our agenda. Register with code FLEX14BLOG and save 20% off of the standard rate.We hope to see you February 24-25 in Berkley, CA!


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!