Showing posts with label Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2015

BPI 2015 Final program just released!



BPI is engineered to be exactly what YOU need it to be. Formal and informal networking experiences connect you to peers, prospects, and customers. Parallel tracks give you the option to dive deep or take a big picture approach to learn about industry trends, challenges, and benchmark against the latest research developments. Big pharma and large, mid-size and emerging biotechs collaborating with solution providers featuring proven and next generation technologies make BPI a one-of-a-kind meeting place.


Bioprocess International
Conference & Exposition
October 26-29, 2015
Hynes Convention Center
Boston, MA


Download the brochure here: >>> http://bit.ly/1K9ELmX
Use code XB15171BLOG for $100 off the current rate.

The Most Comprehensive Science: Capitalize on the latest data-driven research and moderated discussions to move towards commercialization and streamlined development and production from upstream to drug product/fill-finish. 

The Most Innovative Technologies: Accelerate speed, efficiency and ROI across a global network by evaluating innovative and proven products and services at the industry’s largest exposition.
 
The Right Partners for You: Form collaborations and alliances with innovators, suppliers, academia and associations to reach new heights of clinical and commercial success. 

Gain Access to 6 Conference Tracks with 1 Registration Fee:
  • Cell Culture & Upstream Processing;
  • Recovery & Purification;
  • Manufacturing Strategy;
  • Analytical, Formulation and Quality;
  • Drug Product Manufacturing & Fill-Finish Processing;
  • Early Stage Biologics and Early Stage Companies.   
 Meet the People Behind the Products and Get the Answers You Need!

In the largest exposition hall devoted exclusively to biopharmaceutical manufacturing, attendees will learn about the latest technologies and services developed to overcome challenges and streamline processes. Network and consult with the experts from product and service provider companies.

Download the brochure to learn more: >>> http://bit.ly/1K9ELmX

Register by Friday, June 12 to Receive Up To a $500 Savings
Your Savings Code = XB15171BLOG

Register now to save up to $500 here >>> http://bit.ly/1demU18


Group Rates Available for Companies Registering 4+ Attendees.
Call Millison Thenor directly at 646-895-7423.

*Discount is valid for new registrations only and cannot be combined with any other offer.

Best,
The BPI 2015 Team.
@IBCBioProcess
#BPIconf
www.IBCLifeSciences.com/BPI



Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Friday, July 4, 2014

2014 BioProcess International Awards: Nomination Deadline Extended

Important Bioprocess International Awards Announcement: Deadline extended: July 18, 2014

The nomination deadline has been extended by request from our readers and partners to better accommodate the upcoming holiday.

The 2014 BioProcess International Awards celebrate and recognize the outstanding people, organizations and technologies that have significantly changed, impacted, and advanced the efficiency of biotherapeutic development and manufacturing process ultimately allowing the industry to deliver better, more effective treatments to a global patient base.

Help us recognize the leaders in the bioprocessing industry, and nominate your company, colleague, mentor, customer or supplier today!
We will recognize the finalists, and the twelve winners will be announced on October 22, 2014, during the gala award dinner and ceremony at the BioProcess International Conference in Boston, MA.

If you have any questions or need assistance on the submission process please contact, Elizabeth Gormley at egormley@bioprocessintl.com or 508-614-1475.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, July 3, 2014

Vaccine production expanding in developing countries

BioProcess International recently took a look at the growing manufacturing demand in developing countries of vaccines. The big four Pharma companies are in control of the majority of the production of vaccines: Sanofi, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer.  With the world wide market valued at $30 billion a year, vaccines are in demand and widely considered a right and often create a healthier public.  As many governments are the only suppliers of healthcare in growing countries, they find the need to be able to produce these products within their borders so that they can reach their citizens.  New technologies are expanding the capabilities making vaccines affordable, quick and feasible in may of these countries.

Why is production in so many countries possible?  According to BioProcess International:
The great majority of those vaccines in the pipeline involve recombinant technologies, with bioprocessing and equipment much the same as for conventional recombinant proteins and antibodies. Vaccines in development include next-generation, follow-on versions of current products as well as new vaccines for diseases without curret available vaccines. Such diseases primarily affect populations in developing countries (e.g., dengue and malaria).

The technologies making this production possible are:
> Single-use/disposable bioprocessing systems, providing easier operation
> Modular/transportable bioprocessing facilities
> Novel expression systems/improved cell lines
> New purification technologies.

Read the full BioProcess International Article here.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, June 26, 2014

India and it's possible future as a biologics manufacturing leader

India is one of the premier places for biologics and drugs in the world  for the production and manufacturing of drugs.  However, with the need and demand rising both within and outside of the country could turn the Pharma and Biotech sector into an industry that grosses over $100 billion by 2025.  However, according to get to that number, Kiran Mazumdar Shaw of Bitcon in a piece written for The Financial Express believes that growth will come from manufacturing, innovation and entrepreneurship.

How can manufacturing play in to the growth of the biologics industry in India?  It's already one of Pharma's big hubs for manufacturing as it has such as cost effective rate to provide medication.  The country needs $10 billion in exports and should continue to grow.  By 2025, this number could skyrocket and Shaw sees new tax incentives from the government as a large part of that including elimination of service tax on manufacturing services provided to international clients, interest subsidies and long-term loans will also give the industry a much-needed boost. 

The investment required to create biologics is something that India needs to move forward on.  As the industry already has a significant stake in the production market, Shaw makes a significant point that investing and incentivising companies to expand and manufacture their products is an important part of future success in India.

Later this year at BioProcess International, we'll have a full track dedicated to the landscape of manufacturing.  We'll hear from GlaxoSmithKline on how they are transforming biopharmaceutical manufacturing, Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics on how they are planning to prepare for the future pipeline of the biomanufacturing and more.  Find out more about these sessions and the rest of the program, download the agenda.  If you'd like to join us this October 20-23, 2014 in Boston for these sessions, as a reader of this blog, when you register to join us and mention code BPI14JP, you'll save 20% off the standard rate!  Have any questions or want to get involved?  Reach out to Jennifer Pereira.

Do you see India growing as a hub for biologics manufacturing?  If not, what do you see as the next manufacturing hub?


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, June 12, 2014

Capacity in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing

In today's featured interview Peter Moesta, Ph.D., Bristol-Myers Squibb sits down at the 2013 BioProcess International Event to discuss the current pipeline at BMS, cell culture purification and takes an in-depth look at manufacturing capabilities of the companies - including flexible manufacturing, emerging markets and how they would produce medication in those countries.

Watch the full interview here:


This year at BioProcess International, we will continue our focus of the emerging trends and technologies to improve the quality and speed of bioprocess manufacturing.  This year, Philippe-Alexandre Gilbert, Ph.D., Head of Upstream Development of Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics will be joining us to present Biomanufacturing Strategies to Prepare for the Pipeline of the Future.  For more information on this session and the rest of the program, download the brochure.  If you'd like to join us in Boston this October 20-23, as a reader of this blog when you register to join us and mention code BPI14BLOG, you can save 20% off the standard rate!  Do you have any questions or want to get involved with BPI 2014?  Email Jennifer Pereira.



Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Single-Use Tech: How it Stacks Up in Virus Production

This post was contributed by @MikeMadarasz of the Institute of International Research

Over the last ten years, single-use bioreactors have been gaining traction in biopharmaceutical manufacturing by answering some of the key challenges in the industry.  We can expect manufacturers to look to this technology to answer key questions in vaccine production, especially with the need for animal vaccines reportedly expected to increase.  HIPRA, an animal health company focused on biologic products for poultry, swine and dogs among other things, had some recent experience working with single-use bioreactors (SUBs).  They outlined some of the major implications in implementing single-use bioreactors and how they stack up against multiuse bioreactors (MUBs) in a recent study.

Implementation
According to the study, the first thing that should be taken into account when considering a single-use system is whether or not you’re changing from multiuse technology or implementing a single-use system initially.  SUBs tend to deviate from conventional design, so converting from MUBs requires some adjustment on behalf of the manufacturers.  On the other hand, when beginning directly with SUBs, it becomes much easier to start small and scale-up. 

Set up time
SUB installation is much more efficient than the multiuse variety requiring only electrical, power, water and gas supplies.  In addition, the sterilization and cleaning efforts are also greatly reduced.  The report cites this as saving HIPRA about two months of set up time. 

Handling
The fashion in which SUBs and MUBs are handled also deviates.  SUBs tend to require more manual handling than MUBs, where many of the sterilization processes are automated.  To prevent some of the manual errors, many single-use bioreactors utilize a system of interchangeable tubes that must be welded together.  That said, the report recommends changing out “nonweldable” tubing for the variety that’s able to be welded in order to eliminate those errors.  
  
Quality of Process
Due to the nature of these processes and the fact that they deal with many viruses, efficiency is not the only thing that needs attention.  Safety is certainly a concern as well.  How can you properly mitigate biosafety risks?  What can be done to uphold bag integrity?  Is the vendor offering the necessary training?  These are some of the considerations that must be taken into account in both processes.

You can get the full study, Comparing Multiuse and Single-Use Bioreactors for Virus Production, here

We’ve got more on the latest in Single-Use technology.  Check out Single Use for BiopharmaceuticalManufacturing, June 9-10, Boston, MA.  You can download the agenda here.

SAVE 20%* to attend this meeting.  Register here and use code XB14187BLOG. 

Join us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter


*Off the standard rate. New registrants only. 


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Preview Biopharmaceutical Development and Production Week

Recently, Rita Peters of Biopharm International sat down with Biopharmaceutical Development and Production Week producer Michael Keenan sat down to discuss what we can look forward to from this year's event.  The Biopharmacuetical Development landscape will be covered including analytics, upstream, manufacturing, new technologies and more.  How bioproduction is done with today's tools and antibody drug conjugates are also a few of the things that Michael touches on.

Listen to Michael's full podcast here.

Biopharmaceutical Development and Production Week will take place March 24-27, 2014 in San Diego, California.  As a reader of this blog, you're eligible to save 20% off the standard rate when you register to join us and mention code BDP14BLOG.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Focus on Manufacturing Culture

Today we feature an excerpt from our partners at BioProcessing International Magazine "Focus On… Manufacturing Culture," authored by Justin Neway.

Life sciences company leaders need to put the right people, processes, and technologies in place to create evolutionary cultures. Such cultures would embrace advanced manufacturing process intelligence and reap related business benefits. Since the late 1990s, my software company has helped biomanufacturers improve their process understanding. In that time, we’ve seen regulatory drivers such as quality by design (QbD) and process analytical technology (PAT) guidances call for improved manufacturing process performance through better process understanding and optimization. We define process intelligence as the technology and systems needed to design, commercialize, and sustain robust manufacturing processes that provide predictable high-quality outcomes cost-effectively based on scientific process understanding. Through our experiences, we see three key elements helping successful companies reach an advanced level of process intelligence: people, processes, and technologies. Combined correctly, those three components create a process intelligence culture that evolves through distinct levels of advancement. Drawing from “Management 101” lessons, we know that when our customers’ leaders foster cultural change by empowering people and leveraging the right business processes and technologies, organizations reap greater, measurable rewards, including risk reductions, faster times to market, and greater operational efficiencies. Business teams need to drive organizational change before information technology (IT) experts can implement solutions that are measured on their business value. 

Continue reading the article here.

This spring in San Diego, the Biopharmaceutical Development and Process Week will feature a track dedicated to Process Validation & Continued Process Verification featuring speakers from organizations and companies including University of Sheffield, Genentech, Lonza Biologicals and more. Download the agenda to find out more. If you'd like to join us, as a reader of this blog when your register online and mention code BLOG14JP and save 20% off the standard rate.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Biopharma's Flexible Imperative

Today, we feature an excerpt from our partners at Pharmaceutical Manufacturing's eBook Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Trends 2013 Excellence Within a Rapidly Changing Landscape.  Download the full eBook here.  They will be joining us at Biopharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing Week this March 24-28, 2013 in San Diego, California.

Biopharma's Flexible Imperative

Recently, a number of different trends have converged to demand a new type of biopharmaceutical facility, one that emphasizes flexibility and agility. Drawing this new blueprint are:
  • -Business needs to minimize time lines and financial risks
  • -"Biotech on Demand" and the ability to shore up local manufacturing capacity, quickly, to meet market needs;
  • -National security needs for systems that can easily and rapidly respond to biological attacks;
  • -Urgent national health needs to protect the public from large-scale, fast moving epidemics and pandemics
Today's biopharmaceutical manufacturing facilities are smaller and more flexible, efficient and cost-effective than those of the 1990s and the are able to adapt quickly to market changes.   
The goal isn't technology in an dof itself, but greater product and process know-how for speed to market.  With modular systems, we can now place an entire small-scale clinical production line inside an 18'x42'x13' (W x L x H) environment.

Download the Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Trends 2013 eBook here.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, September 12, 2013

Single-Use Stirred Tank Bioreactors: Enabling Flexible Biomanufacturing

Author: Brandy Sargent, Editor, Cell Culture Dish, www.CellCultureDish.com.  Brandy will be joining us this year at BioProcess International as a guest blogger on September 16-19, 2013 in Boston, MA.  If you'd like to join us at BioProcess International, as a reader of this blog, register to join us and mention code BLOG13JP to save 20% off the standard rate!

Background
Stainless Steel Stirred Tank Bioreactors have been used for several years in biomanufacturing and have proven their effectiveness across several biomanufacturing platforms. Of all production platforms, CHO cells are the most prevalent in stirred tank reactors, but they have also been successfully used with other platforms including insect cells, yeast, E. coli, plant cells, Pseudomonas, hybridoma, vero and others. While stirred tank bioreactors are traditionally associated with suspension culture, the use of microcarriers and associated technologies have allowed adherent cell lines to be effectively cultured in stirred tanks and stirred tanks have also had some success in stem cell manufacturing.

The traditional model for manufacturing biopharmaceuticals is to build a manufacturing facility focused on fixed stainless steel stirred bioreactors usually in sizes ranging between 100 – 25,000 liters. These facilities require high initial capital investment and large overhead. Initial capital investment includes cost of setting up the bioreactors, detailed facility design including piping and infrastructure for media delivery, plus water and steam necessary for Clean in Place (CIP), Steam in Place (SIP) and Water for Injection (WFI) requirements. The challenge with this traditional design is that these facilities have large manufacturing capacity, but little flexibility. They usually focus on manufacturing a handful of biopharmaceuticals requiring large volumes. However if demand changes, cell culture improvements result in higher titer, or any other alterations to volume requirements, excess capacity can quickly become a problem.

Due to some of the challenges experienced with traditional fixed biomanufacturing facilities there has been a desire to create more flexible spaces. Improvements in cell culture and downstream processing have made manufacturing more productive resulting in higher titers and product quality. In some cases reducing the overall number of cell culture liters required to meet a biopharmaceutical’s demand. As a result, facilities that were used to operating at capacity could find they now have costly capacity excess to fill.

Single-use Stirred Bioreactors Designed for Flexibility
The development and subsequent improvements to single-use stirred bioreactors have offered a more flexible and cost effective alternative to their stainless steel fixed counterparts. Single-use stirred bioreactors offer several advantages that makes them an attractive option in designing flexible facilities:

Reduced Start Up Time and Capital Investment
Single-use stirred bioreactors offer a reduction in installation time. They don’t require extensive piping systems or infrastructure to support media delivery, clean in place, or steam in place requirements. The overall capital investment is also reduced due to the simpler facility design, smaller facility footprint and lower cost for equipment. In addition, many single-use stirred bioreactors offer “ready out of the box,” efficiency, which provides lower set up hurdles prior to use.

Process Flexibility
Single-use stirred bioreactors offer optimal process flexibility, particularly when combined with other single-use technologies. The ability to move these bioreactors around offers tremendous flexibility in facility layout and process flow. This allows the bioreactors to move to other areas within one facility based on need or even to other manufacturing locations. Because these are mobile and disposable, they do not need to be dedicated to one product type. For example, they could be used to manufacture one product for a clinical trial material campaign in one area, then moved to another area and used for commercial product manufacturing. Each different product may utilize different cell lines, media or other manufacturing requirements, but single-use bioreactors can be repurposed and utilized in different scenarios.

Single-use stirred bioreactors also support different production modes including fed batch, perfusion or continuous processing. Just like their stainless steel counterparts, they have been proven across many different biomanufacturing platforms and have consistently performed comparably with fixed stainless steel bioreactors.

Manufacturing Efficiency
One of the biggest advantages for single-use stirred bioreactors is the reduction or elimination of cleaning, sterilization and validation requirements. This reduces product changeover time and thus promotes increased manufacturing efficiency and improves scheduling of product manufacturing. Disposable systems also reduce the risk of product cross contamination, thus eliminating costly manufacturing shut downs. As mentioned in process flexibility, because these bioreactors are not fixed or dedicated, they can be moved around to create a manufacturing configuration that is most efficient.

Single-use stirred bioreactors coupled with new automation systems, offer a truly all in one solution. With the ability to have advanced control over processes, including data management, temperature, RPM, pH, DO, gas and liquid flow rates, weight and pressure, these systems offer a number of parameters to be set automatically and can even aid in troubleshooting. They also make evaluating data convenient with export options.

Flexible Scaling to Meet Product Demand
Single-use stirred bioreactors offer many choices as to size and scale (<1L - 2,000L), so that lot sizes can be matched with the current product demand. If product demand changes, then the scale of the single-use bioreactor can also be adjusted to keep pace, which greatly reduces costly capacity excess or drug shortages. This also enables the move toward smaller market or orphan drug products that have smaller product demand.

Cost Savings
Single-use stirred bioreactors can offer a reduction in cost of goods by reducing overall utility costs, reducing or eliminating manufacturing steps (cleaning and validation, for example), reduction in labor requirements, and as mentioned earlier, scalability to more closely match demand.


Single-use Bioreactors Offer Solutions to Manufacturing Challenges
There are several specific manufacturing challenges to which single-use bioreactors and even entire single-use systems are well suited. Below I have listed some examples.

More Products, Smaller Volumes
There has been increasing need to produce more products at smaller volumes. This has occurred for several reasons. First, product yield increases has reduced the need for 10,000 – 25,000 liter batches and allowed for the opportunity to manufacture multiple products in the same facility. Traditionally turnaround time and cleaning, sterilization, and validation would have made it challenging to produce many products at the same facility. However with single-use systems, cleaning, sterilization and validation are greatly reduced or eliminated, thus enabling multiple products produced in the same facility at smaller lot sizes.

Biosimilars
Another industry area where single-use bioreactors can be very effective is in biosimilar manufacturing. Biosimilars will have new technologies available that the original biopharmaceutical manufacturer did not, including single-use systems. Speed to market plus reduced cost will be key drivers in the success of biosimilars. In terms of speed, single-use bioreactors clearly have the advantage by offering reduced installation time, no piping infrastructure required, and easy set up with “ready out of the box” type operations. In addition they offer more attractive economics with lower start up costs and lower water for injection use requirements.

Clinical Trial Material
There has also been a great deal of interest in the ability to manufacture clinical trial material with limited investment. When drugs enter clinical trials it is unclear at that time how the drugs will do or if they will eventually earn approval. The attrition rate for investigational drugs is quite high, so logically companies do not want to make significant capital investments in manufacturing these products prior to approval. The flexible manufacturing offered by single-use bioreactors is perfectly suited to address these needs. Clinical trial manufacturing campaigns can be initiated to manufacture the necessary product and then can be switched to manufacture a different drug or could be taken offline until future need arises.

Globalization
With product globalization, there is a desire to manufacture medicines closer to the populations that they will be supplied to. This also provides some security with respect to facilities going offline. If one facility goes offline due to contamination, natural disaster, etc., the entire product supply chain will not be disrupted. With flexible manufacturing options, more single-use bioreactors could come online to address any temporary shortages. Ideally model single-use system facilities could be designed with the goal of replicating these facilities in multiple countries or regions.


Employing Single-use Systems Facility Wide
While single-use stirred bioreactors are a primary enabling strategy to achieving the goal of flexible manufacturing, there are a variety of single-use technologies, which when combined, create entire single-use systems that can support the entire biomanufacturing process from upstream to downstream. Single use products like disposable mixers and filters can aid upstream preparation of cell culture media. In manufacturing, single-use bioreactors and single-use mixers offer many advantages in terms of reduced cleaning, sterilization and validation up to the 2,000 liter scale. Finally downstream can take advantage of single-use filtration, centrifugation and chromatography options, many of which are still in development and improving rapidly.

A recent study titled “Fast Track API Manufacturing from Shake Flask to Production Scale Using a 1000-L Single-Use Facility” by B. Minnow, et al., and published in Chemie Ingenieur Technik, describes how Rentschler Biotechnologie set up a “fast and flexible multipurpose manufacturing facility in the 1,000L scale”. The completely single-use facility was awarded Facility of the Year in 2012 by the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering. The facility was able to reduce manufacturing costs, timelines and experienced increased flexibility for clinical manufacturing. Scale up was from shake flasks to 1,000L production scale.

In the study, a CHO DG44 DHFR line producing a monoclonal antibody that was optimized for high titer was thawed and initially expanded in shake flasks. Further cell expansion was performed in 50L and 200L XDR single-use stirred bioreactors (Xcellerex). The final production reactor was a 1000L XDR single-use stirred bioreactor (Xcellerex). A 28 day (vial thaw to harvest) fed batch process was used in the study.

The scale-up was performed based on calculating the specific volumetric power input, which allowed a direct transfer from small culture volumes to the production scale. A seeding volume of 700L was used.

The study demonstrated that fast track protein production could be achieved in less than 12 weeks from cell bank to final bulk drug product. The authors of the study stated the following in the conclusion. “With these experiments a fast track concept for the manufacturing of active pharmaceutical ingredients in single-use bioreactors combined with a robust and reliable process was shown. This led to a short manufacturing timeline from clone to product. A well-known and also simple scale-up strategy was applied and the calculated specific volumetric power input was used as key scale-up parameter. Additionally, results regarding product quality and titer as well as reproducibility in key process parameters are highly comparable. Finally, it was concluded that the applied scale-up method is feasible for single-use bioreactors in production scale as well as for non single-use bioreactors in laboratory scale.”

Conclusion
With the many pressures facing biomanufacturing today including cost effective manufacturing, stringent regulatory requirements and effective capacity management coupled with the many different product demands, it is not surprising that companies are looking for more flexible manufacturing options. In particular, single-use bioreactors and platforms enable fast-track manufacturing strategies. Single-use stirred bioreactors and single-use system based facilities are key in enabling these processes and moving manufacturing forward to meet new biopharmaceutical manufacturing challenges.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, August 22, 2013

eBook: Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Trends 2013 - A Rapidly Changing Landscape

Today, we feature a guest post from BioProcess International media partner PharmaManufacturing.com.  Want to join them at BioProcess International taking place this September 16-18, 2013, in Boston, MA? As a reader of this blog when you register to join us and mention code BLOG13JP and save 20% off the standard rate.

eBook: Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Trends 2013 - A Rapidly Changing Landscape

Although analytical assays rank towards the top of biomanufacturers’ new product development interests, single-use, disposable products are at or near the top of the list. Preliminary data from the study reveals that end-users are interested chiefly in disposable products, bags and connectors (49%), while also expressing a desire for improvements in disposable probes and sensors (30%), disposable bioreactors (29%), and disposable purification (29%). These areas have been consistently in demand for several years now.

Disposable devices continue to make advances in manufacturing and are becoming increasingly common in most areas of biopharmaceutical production. Although, as yet, there are few non-rigid single-use devices (e.g., bioreactor bag liners) used in commercial scale GMP applications, it is likely this will change quickly as new products move through the development pipeline and out of clinical-scale manufacturing. Further, as regulators gain familiarity with the safety profiles and materials used in such devices, necessary approvals for product manufacture are apt to accelerate as well. When this occurs, the market volume for single-use devices is likely to increase significantly.

This year, 22% of the Biotechnology Industry Council members surveyed believed that single-use system integration would be the key trend for the year. Within this burgeoning area, participants identified several sub-trends.

These include:
  • • Building quality into single-use operations to further reduce regulatory activities/oversight;
  • • Fixing disposable bioreactors that create inconsistent growth due to changes in resins, films, gamma irradiation, and cell line specificity;
  • • Downstream operations using membrane adsorbers;
  • • Emergence of flexible and modular biomanufacturing facilities;
  • • Establishing leachables and extract ables guidance for testing;
  • • Improved upstream contamination investigations from a QA perspective;
  • • Introducing single-use devices at GMP commercial scale manufacturing; and
  • • Leachables and extractables [standardization] at clinical and commercial scale.
There are two interwoven trends worth an additional look. The first regards leachables and extractables. Last year, there were reported problems with the reliability and performance of available disposable solutions, with leachables and extractables a key factor. As Rick Johnston, Ph.D., CEO of Bioproduction Group Inc. noted, these issues “undermined confidence in the ability for … manufacturers to supply material in a timely manner to support production. This led many biomanufacturers to aggressively pursue dual-sourcing and risk-mitigation strategies like holding large inventories, both of which raise overall production costs. It is hoped that in the 2013 time period these issues can be resolved to allow the promise of disposables to be realized in the biomanufacturing setting.”

Download the whole eBook here.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Flexible Facilities 2014: Call for Speakers/Mark Your Calendar

Innovative Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Solutions for Multi-Product Pipelines,
Global Markets, On-Demand Scale-up/Scale-Down and Capacity Optimization
February 24-25, 2014 • The Claremont Hotel & Spa • Berkeley, CA

IBC’s Flexible Facilities conference will bring together senior level VPs, directors, managers, group leaders and scientists involved in manufacturing, technical operations, process development, engineering, regulatory and quality to discuss the strategic, technical, economic and regulatory/quality considerations necessary for implementation of more flexible, modular or multi-product biomanufacturing facilities throughout the world. Thought-leaders from biopharma companies, technology providers, CMO’s and engineering firms will discuss the latest facility designs, evaluate existing and future technology needs and share potential hurdles and creative solutions regarding the new wave of flexible biomanufacturing options that continue to emerge. This conference will also emphasize case studies of lessons learned and practical experiences by companies who have implemented flexible technologies and flexible facilities.

Call for Speakers
We Are Currently Accepting Proposals for Speaker Presentations: To submit a proposal, you will be asked to select the conference topic you are interested in presenting, provide a 100-150 word summary of your proposed talk by Friday, August 30 and provide your full contact details.

We are looking for presentations in the following topic areas:
  • • Novel Facility Design Concepts (Open Ballroom, Modular, Hybrid, Plug and Play, Single Use)
  • • Case Studies of Making Stainless Steel Facilities More Flexible/Retrofitting
  • • Economic Analyses and Quality Risks of Flexible Biomanufacturing vs. Stainless Steel
  • • Regulatory Perspectives on Flexible Facilities and Technologies in Clinical and Commercial Scale
  • • Practical Experiences and Challenges Implementing Single Use in a Facility
  • • Case Studies of Implementing a Flexible Facility at Commercial Scale
  • • Implementation Case Studies of (Dual Trains, Multi-Products, 2 Different Cell Lines, Concurrent Viral and Bacterial, etc.)
  • • Case Studies of Multi-Product Facilities (Nuts and Bolts , Cleaning, Changeover, Gowning)
  • • Implementations of Continuous Manufacturing and Closed Systems
  • • Case Studies of Implementing Flexible Facilities for Emerging Markets – Lessons Learned
  • • Case Studies that Highlight Gaps in Existing Technologies – What Technologies Need to be Improved to Enable Flexible Facilities?
  • • Case Studies of Implementing Automation and Data Management Systems in Flexible Facilities

Click here for a complete list of topics or to submit.

Proposals will be selected for oral presentations based on evidence in the abstract showing a concrete case study, technology implementation or practical application/technique. All speaker submissions should be received by Friday, August 30, 2013.

Sponsorships and Exhibits – Reserve Your Booth Today
If you are a biopharma CMO, engineering firm or technology provider working in single use/disposables, modular systems, plug and play technologies, facility automation, manufacturing execution systems (MES), control systems, data management/visualization and related technologies, you can not afford to miss this event. The biopharma thought-leaders who make facility-related technology and outsourcing decisions will be attending this conference. Reserve your exhibit booth today or contact us to find out about other opportunities to promote your product or service at this event through sponsorships and other marketing opportunities.For more information, please contact: Sherry Johnson at sjohnson@ibcusa.com or 508-614-1451

Thank you for your interest in IBC’s Flexible Facilities conference. Please don’t hesitate to contact me at jpereira@iirusa.com if you have any questions about the program.


Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Monday, August 12, 2013

Perfusion Bioreactors -A closer look

Author: Brandy Sargent, Editor, Cell Culture Dish, www.CellCultureDish.com

In the biopharmaceutical industry there is an ever-present drive to increase product yield and reduce cost. The industry is driven in this direction, not only by the drive to improve manufacturing techniques, but also by pressure from the government, physicians, and patients to reduce the overall cost of medications. However these cost savings must be achieved without compromising high safety standards.

Since the inception of biopharmaceutical manufacturing in the 1980’s there have been continual improvements to the process. These improvements have culminated in the most common approach to biopharmaceutical manufacturing, fed batch suspension culture, most commonly expressed in CHO cells. While improvements have continued in areas including advancements in cloning, media formulation, removal of animal components, and downstream purification resins and columns, there has been little change to the actual fed batch paradigm. One technology that could perhaps make a big change in how biopharmaceuticals are manufactured is the use of perfusion bioreactors. Perfusion technology has improved extensively since its creation and its application to large-scale manufacturing and other applications in the production of biologics deserves a second, closer look.

How Perfusion Bioreactors Work

Traditional fed-batch bioreactor systems consist of tanks that are usually between 10,000-25,000 liters. Cells are cultured in batches that typically run between 7-21 days by which time media nutrients have been consumed and toxic waste has begun to accumulate. During the run, cells secrete the protein of interest into the media and at the end of the run the protein is separated from cell mass as a batch. Typical product yields are in the range of 1 to 4 grams per liter depending on the clone and antibody. While regular improvements have moved product yield from under 1 gram per liter to where they are now, it has not improved other issues in fed batch manufacturing including large manufacturing footprints and challenges with scalability.

In contrast, perfusion bioreactors culture cells over much longer periods, even months, by continuously feeding the cells with fresh media and removing spent media while keeping cells in culture. In perfusion there are different ways to keep the cells in culture while removing spent media. One way is to keep the cells in the bioreactor by using capillary fibers or membranes, which the cells bind to. Another does not bind the cells, but rather relies on filtration systems that keep the cells in the bioreactor while allowing the media to be removed. Another method is the use of a centrifuge to separate cells and return them to the bioreactor.

Examples of cell separation methods:
  • GE Healthcare’s Hollow Fiber Microfiltration Cartridges – “In this system, the retentate consists of the cells, which flow past the membrane and are sent back to the bioreactor. The spent medium is the permeate that passes through the membrane.”
  • ATMI’s iCELLis Single Use Fixed Bed – In this system, cells are bound to custom microcarriers, which allows cells to stay in place while media flows around them.
  • Centrifuge method – In this system, a centrifuge is used to separate cells from culture media and then cells are returned to the bioreactor.

Advantages of Perfusion

Product Quality and Stability

By continuously removing spent media and replacing it with new media, nutrient levels are maintained for optimal growing conditions and cell waste product is removed to avoid toxicity. In addition, the product is regularly removed before being exposed to excessive waste that causes protein degradation. Product is also harvested and purified much more quickly, which is particularly helpful when producing a product that is unstable.

Scalability

With fed batch culture, demand quickly outpaces pilot scale facilities and more bioreactors need to be added to increase production. With the addition of additional bioreactors comes a decision, either to outsource to a contract manufacturer or build out a larger dedicated manufacturing space. Once the facility is built, scale flexibility is difficult. It takes money to operate the facility even if no drugs are being manufactured there. If for some reason demand goes down, companies can find themselves with a lot of costly extra capacity.

Perfusion bioreactors offer several advantages over traditional fed-batch bioreactors when addressing problems of scalability and increasing demand. Maybe the most critical advantage is that perfusion bioreactors are smaller in size and can produce the same product yield in less space. Typically perfusion bioreactors operate at 10-30x concentrations compared to fed-batch bioreactors. For example, it has been shown that a 50-liter perfusion bioreactor can produce the same yield as a 1,000-liter fed-batch bioreactor. Therefore, the use of perfusion should enable the replacement of typical 10,000 L bioreactors with 1,000L bioreactors without negatively impacting the yearly yield of manufactured product.

This size advantage is important because it means that facilities don’t need a significant increase in space to increase production. Similarly, perfusion bioreactors require less on utilities cost and they are less labor intensive to operate. Thus requiring significantly less capital investment on the front end and less on operating costs to manufacture the same yield as fed-batch bioreactors.

Cost Savings

Some proponents have argued that considerable cost savings is a further benefit of perfusion bioreactor manufacturing and this topic was covered in a Cell Culture Dish blog titled “Are Perfusion Cell Culture Systems the Future for Cell Culture Based Biomanufacturing.” The blog summarizes a talk given by John Bonham-Carter on the cost savings found in the use of Refine Technology’s ATF System.


Click here continue reading.




Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!


Thursday, August 8, 2013

Roche Supports Quality by Design Process in Biopharmaceutical Development

Today, we feature a guest post from BioProcess International media partner PharmaManufacturing.com.  Want to join them at BioProcess International taking place this September 16-18, 2013, in Boston, MA? As a reader of this blog when you register to join us and mention code BLOG13JP and save 20% off the standard rate.


Roche announced the launch of its new alpha-2,6-Sialyltransferase for in vitro sialylation of glycoproteins and complex molecules as human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The enzyme, which is offered for research and pilot scale applications, is produced under animal-origin free conditions and offers a very high lot-to-lot consistency.

“This launch is the first in a series to offer a complete glyco-engineering portfolio of key enzymes and activated sugars covering a broad spectrum of applications,” said Ruedi Stoffel, Head of Biochemical Reagents & Custom Biotech. “The initial feedback from bio-manufacturing customers showed that our continuous scientific and technical support throughout the up-scaling and development process differentiates Roche as a strong partner.”

The alpha-2,6-Sialyltransferase delivers up to 95% bi-antennary sialylation of N-Glycan chains within 6 – 8 hours, a performance which is currently not offered by competitor products. It is based on a human genome sequence and expressed in mammalian expression systems. Over the coming months, Roche plans to complete the portfolio through launches of additional Sialyl-and Galactosyltransferases.

Glycosylation is considered to be one of the main sources of biologics’ heterogeneity and is seen as a critical quality attribute by regulatory bodies. The implementation of Quality by Design Standards in the manufacturing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients such as mAbs with specific glycosylation patterns is expected to play a central role in future bio-manufacturing processes.



Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!